tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.comments2023-10-19T21:23:52.838+08:00calvinistguy :: theblogcalvinistguyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05157229724513921193noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-64113276308162466752018-05-19T14:20:05.508+08:002018-05-19T14:20:05.508+08:00distance mba in india
Truth be told, the verifiabl...<a href="https://www.mibmglobal.com/fast-track-programme.php?id=FTBBA" rel="nofollow">distance mba in india</a><br />Truth be told, the verifiable records permit at most an Exile up to 69 years and around 16 days. This reality firmly underpins the futurist position, however do you know why? Is it accurate to say that you were even mindful that the Exile was such a great amount of shorter than what most have assumed?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05174647958540286658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-22589197007109488822017-08-15T03:08:52.087+08:002017-08-15T03:08:52.087+08:00CalvanistGuy, where did you get the Greek version ...CalvanistGuy, where did you get the Greek version of verses 31 and 32? If you put verse 31 into Google Translate, this is what it says: For this I say, I pray thee, and blasphemy is rendered to the man or to the spirit blasphemy, which is despised.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02031112067630852735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-88350918539733487492017-08-15T03:08:22.574+08:002017-08-15T03:08:22.574+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02031112067630852735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-57214535401819238672016-07-18T08:57:09.313+08:002016-07-18T08:57:09.313+08:00For the Love of GOD and Scripture and all that is ...For the Love of GOD and Scripture and all that is Holy, please stop making stuff up and trying to reinterpret the Holy Scriptures, you can't reassign your own mean8ngAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515865316864835393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-64452354372994062752016-07-18T08:57:04.101+08:002016-07-18T08:57:04.101+08:00Christ said "anyone that speaks a word agains...Christ said "anyone that speaks a word against the holy spirit is guilty of an Eternal sin"<br /><br />SPEAK A WORD = BLASPHEMY, DOES NOT =DENIAL OR REJECTION OR UNBELIEF. <br /><br />THE HOLY SPIRIT IS GOD<br /><br />Blasphemy against the Son of man is forgiven because he is a man.<br /><br />Blasphemy against GOD is not Forgiven but is an Eternal sin, God is the Holy Spirit.<br /><br />Jesus is the veil between us and God, or was, but the veil was torn... You understand what he was saying, BLASPHEMY AGAINST GOD IS NOT FORGIVEN.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515865316864835393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-30779880682709172016-07-18T06:46:25.373+08:002016-07-18T06:46:25.373+08:00It seems pretty Obvious he is referring to Blasphe...It seems pretty Obvious he is referring to Blasphemy against GOD, but he could be referring to speaking against the miracles in the Messianic and Apostalic Ages, I would love to believe that more than any other person. But the Greek words seem to suggest Not now or in eternity, never!!!! And Jesus seems to be referring to Blasphemy against GOD as Opposed to Blasphemy against his Human Veil, (Person or Body, Human Nature). It seems far too obvious and clear.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515865316864835393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-87993666733913924862016-07-18T05:59:59.636+08:002016-07-18T05:59:59.636+08:00Christ said "anyone that speaks a word agains...Christ said "anyone that speaks a word against the holy spirit is guilty of an Eternal sin"<br /><br />SPEAK A WORD = BLASPHEMY, DOES NOT =DENIAL OR REJECTION OR UNBELIEF. <br /><br />THE HOLY SPIRIT IS GOD<br /><br />Blasphemy against the Son of man is forgiven because he is a man.<br /><br />Blasphemy against GOD is not Forgiven but is an Eternal sin, God is the Holy Spirit.<br /><br />Jesus is the veil between us and God, or was, but the veil was torn... You understand what he was saying, BLASPHEMY AGAINST GOD IS NOT FORGIVEN.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515865316864835393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-83907645593920529412016-07-18T05:55:39.589+08:002016-07-18T05:55:39.589+08:00For the Love of GOD and Scripture and all that is ...For the Love of GOD and Scripture and all that is Holy, please stop making stuff up and trying to reinterpret the Holy Scriptures, you can't reassign your own mean8ngAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515865316864835393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-33869229070154181592015-01-16T08:50:37.546+08:002015-01-16T08:50:37.546+08:00There was the First Aion Age when Jesus was walkin...There was the First Aion Age when Jesus was walking the Earth and arguing with the Pharisees, which corresponds to when Jesus said “This age” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:31-32)<br /> <br /> There was the Second Aion Age when Jesus was dead in the tomb, which corresponds to when Jesus said “the age to come” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:31-32)<br /> <br /> There is a the Third Aion Age when Jesus was resurrected alive again and also is the Age when Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit is forgiven and is also the age that we are in now. This age goes on for eternity. <br /><br />Thus ALL GO TO HEAVEN and nothing changed about grace. <br />Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is the term word for unbelief.<br />ALL GO TO HEAVEN BECAUSE unbelief is forgiven.<br /><br />A Time in the Life of Jesus is an Age because Jesus is God and is that important.<br /><br />“Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. ” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:32)<br /><br />Matthew 12:32 is when Jesus canceled the Old Code of the law found in Matthew 12:31.<br /><br />“And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:31)<br /><br />“Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. ” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:32)<br /><br />In the Third age blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is forgiven along with all sins. <br /><br />Jesus died for You You will go to heaven.<br /><br />There was the First Aion Age when Jesus was walking the Earth and arguing with the Pharisees, which corresponds to when Jesus said “This age” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:31-32)<br />There was the Second Aion Age when Jesus was dead in the tomb, which corresponds to when Jesus said “the age to come” (Bible, New Testament, Matthew 12:31-32)<br />There is a the Third Aion Age when Jesus was resurrected alive again and also is the Age when Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit is forgiven and is also the age that we are in now. This age goes on for eternity.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04752920623738293756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-17356925878441525572013-07-01T20:14:39.983+08:002013-07-01T20:14:39.983+08:00CALLING ON THE NAME OF THE LORD?
What is the mean...CALLING ON THE NAME OF THE LORD?<br /><br />What is the meaning of calling on the name of the Lord? Many assume that believing in Jesus and saying a form of a sinner's prayer constitutes, calling on the name of the Lord. The problem with that theory is none of the conversions under the New Covenant support that assumption. Not one time is anyone ever told to believe and say the sinner's prayer in order to be saved.<br /><br />The apostle Peter on the Day of Pentecost quoted the prophet Joel, Acts 2:21 And it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved." (NKJV)<br /><br />The apostle Peter preached the first gospel sermon under the New Covenant. Peter did not tell the 3000 converts to believe and say the sinner's prayer.<br /><br />Peter preached the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. He preached Jesus as both Lord and Christ. When they heard this they asked Peter and the rest of the brethren what they should do?(Acts 2:22-37) Peter told them what to do. Acts 2:38 Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.(NKJV)<br /><br />How did the 3000 on the Day of Pentecost call on the name of the Lord and become saved?<br />1. They believed that Jesus was both Lord and Christ.<br />2. They believed that God raised Jesus from the grave.<br />3. They repented. Repentance is a change of heart. Repentance means to be converted so that God may forgive your sins. Repentance is to make the intellectual commitment to turn from sin and turn toward God. (Acts 3:19, Acts 2:38)<br />4. They were immersed in water (baptized) so that their sins could be forgiven.<br /><br />How did the 3000 on the Day of Pentecost not call on the name of the Lord?<br />1. They did not say a sinner's prayer.<br />2. Not one person was asked to pray for forgiveness.<br />3. Not one single man was told to be baptized as a testimony of his faith.<br />4. No one was told that water baptism was a just an act of obedience.<br />5. No one was informed they were saved the very minute they believed.<br />6. Not one person was told that water baptism was not essential for the forgiveness of sins.<br />7. Not one person was told to be baptized so they could join a denominational church.<br /><br />Jesus said he that believes and is baptized shall be saved. (Mark 16"16) Jesus did not say he who believes and says a sinner's prayer shall be saved.<br /><br /> <br />You ARE INVITED TO READ MY BLOG POSTINGS--Steve FinnellSteve Finnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12863026367048527526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-61323889732800651222012-04-09T11:49:58.435+08:002012-04-09T11:49:58.435+08:00First, your claim that exegetical consistency dema...First, your claim that exegetical consistency demands that Dispensationalists should understand any point <i>after</i> the 69 weeks as being IN the 70th week, based on Hosea 6:2, loses all of its force when the 70 weeks of Jewish <i>disobedience</i> are considered which necessitated the Exile. For recall that the 70 weeks of Jewish disobedience are implied in the 70 years of Jewish Exile, in which each year of the Exile represented a 7-year period in which the Jews had failed to ‘sabbath’ (i.e., rest) their land in the 7th year of a 7-year period, as per the commandment. <br /><br />In other words, 70 years of agricultural Sabbath-breaking, i.e., 490 years of disobedience, are implied in the 70 year Exile; <b>yet note that this 490 years of disobedience was <i>non-contiguous</i>, occurring over about an 800 year period. </b> And so, obviously implied was a 1st Sabbath year that went observed, <i>after</i> which there was a 2nd Sabbath year that went unobserved, <i>after</i> which there was a 3rd Sabbath year that went unobserved, and so forth, all the way up to 70 Sabbath years that went unobserved, at which point God acted to send Judah into Exile. The implied numerical sequence is undeniable, since there is an all but <i>quid pro quo</i> between the 70 years of agricultural Sabbath breaking and the 70 year Exile to allow the land to rest.<br /><br /> That is, there could not have been a 70th year of agricultural Sabbath breaking unless there had been a 69th, nor a 69th year of agricultural Sabbath breaking unless there had been a 68th, and so forth. And so, while the word “after” doesn’t technically occur (like the word <i>trinity</i> throughout the Bible) it is certainly implied in Daniel 9. And, again, because many of these years which came <i><b>after</b></i> each other one were often interrupted by periods of time before the next numerically sequenced, agricultural Sabbath-breaking took place, your argument that any numbered day or year which follows its preceding numbered day or year must come without interruption, cannot be sustained. <br /><br />Cry as theologians might, into their beer mugs over a desire for “exegetical consistency,” God has not always seen fit to arrange His plans to accommodate the way theologians presume the Bible must be understood. <br /><br />I may continue to critique your complaints against the Dispensationalist view of a parenthesis between the 69th and 70th week, especially if I see that you are still active on this blog. In the meantime, I continue to await your response about why the 70 years of Exile were ca. only ‘69’ in number, and why that would have nevertheless satisfied God’s sense of justice.<br /><br />Daniel GracelyUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03103470748060341738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-8999395896643264252012-04-09T10:12:50.223+08:002012-04-09T10:12:50.223+08:00Are you still active on this blog? If so, I plan o...Are you still active on this blog? If so, I plan on responding at greater length.<br /><br />My chief complaint is your too narrow focus on 'textual' issues at the expense of the biblical and extra-biblical <i>historical</i> record. For example, presumably your view interprets the 70 years of Exile as 70 normal solar years? But then why doesn't the historical record show this? <br /><br />In fact, the historical records allow at most an Exile up to 69 years and about 16 days. This fact strongly supports the futurist position, but do you know why? Were you even aware that the Exile was so much shorter than what most have supposed?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03103470748060341738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-482074623575075650.post-2590571584561043622010-10-16T15:42:33.589+08:002010-10-16T15:42:33.589+08:00I am interested in the study of early christianity...I am interested in the study of early christianity, especially the creation and formative years. perhaps the first 200. To show you some of the stuff I have been collecting, and trying to organize, take a look at these two pages, and see if anything interests you;<br /><br />http://webulite.dyndns.org:8080/christianity<br /><br />http://webulite.dyndns.org:8080/tag/christianity?do=showtag&tag=tag%3Achristianity<br /><br />I am interested in convos on anything in the early christianity general areas, what are you interested in at the moment?<br /><br />Cheers! RichGriese@gmail.comRich Griesehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16947798364523082547noreply@blogger.com